< h 2 >Your AI Assistant is Exp ensive and Slow </ h 2 >< p >Last Wednesday at 11 PM , I was staring blank ly at my bill in the study — my monthly API costs had exceeded $ 200 again . I only use it to write customer emails and run batch copy writing , so how is it this expensive ? If you 're also using AI for daily content , you definitely know this pain .</ p >< h 2 > What is Mist ral Medium 3 . 5 </ h 2 >< p >M ist ral is a French AI company , and Medium 3 . 5 is their newly released mid -tier model . In plain terms : the performance is about on par with Claude Son net , but the price is less than half . I got stuck here too —I assumed cheap models must be useless , but after testing , it ’s completely sufficient for writing Chinese emails and making customer summaries . My friend Xia ochen , who does cross -border e -commerce in Hang zhou , used this model last Friday afternoon to run batch product descriptions . 200 items only cost $ 0 . 3 , saving 70 % compared to G PT - 4 o .</ p >< h 2 >Your Rep lication Cost Today </ h 2 >< p > Money : Input is about $ 0 . 4 per million tokens ( about 3 R MB ), output is about $ 2 per million tokens ( about 15 R MB ). Time : About 30 minutes from registration to getting it running . Technical barrier : You need to register a Mist ral account and get a password string called an " API key " ( just a string of letters and numbers , copy and paste it ), and put it into your tool . First step : Open mist ral .ai , click " Sign up " in the upper right corner , and register with your email .</ p >< h 2 > Advice by Stage </ h 2 >< p >If you are just starting out and still trying various tools for free , it ’s okay not to try this now ; getting the business running is more important . If you have 1 - 2 clients and are using AI to write copy or reply to emails , I 'd suggest taking a small task to test it — like having Medium 3 . 5 write three customer follow -up emails , and compare it with the model you are currently using to see how much the effect differs . If you are scaling up and API costs are already making your wallet hurt , I 'd seriously suggest migrating batch tasks ( summ aries , translations , simple copy writing ) to this model , and leaving the expensive models for jobs that require deep reasoning .</ p >
M ist ralAPI savingsInd ie M akersContent GenerationSmall Teams··2 min read·chatopc.com·via mistral.ai·
AI Too Price y ? This Model : 3 R MB /M illion Tokens
相关推荐
同分类:ai_tools
VulpinePython
一位开发者把 Python 改写给模型看,AI 编程开始补“输入层”短板
一位开发者用约 1.3 万个 Python 文件测试,把面向人类阅读的代码编译成更适合大模型处理的表示形式,令输入 token 降低约 14%,且 99.8% 能无损还原。值得关心的是,AI 编程的瓶颈可能不只在模型能力,也在模型“读代码”的方式。
6月3日·www.reddit.com
B站AI Agent
2.8万元摸索出一套AI编程法,真正稀缺的开始不是代码而是文档
一位独立游戏开发者用约2.8万元试出一套 AI 编程流程,核心结论不是“AI 会写代码”,而是需求、文档和人工审查变得更重要。这值得关心,因为它提示我们:AI 进入工作流后,管理复杂任务的方式正在先变。
6月2日·juejin.cn
openaicodex
Codex 上手机,不只是补入口
OpenAI 把 Codex 接进 ChatGPT mobile app,表面是多一个入口,实质是把 coding agent 从 desktop 工具拉回 ChatGPT distribution 体系,直接对 Claude Code 的使用频次与工作流控制权开战。
5月14日·www.theverge.com
VulpinePython
一位开发者把 Python 改写给模型看,AI 编程开始补“输入层”短板
一位开发者用约 1.3 万个 Python 文件测试,把面向人类阅读的代码编译成更适合大模型处理的表示形式,令输入 token 降低约 14%,且 99.8% 能无损还原。值得关心的是,AI 编程的瓶颈可能不只在模型能力,也在模型“读代码”的方式。
6月3日·www.reddit.com
Qwen 2.5 7BApostate
三种工具都能拆掉模型“安全阀”,这说明开源大模型的护栏并不牢靠
一组针对 Qwen 2.5 7B 的测试显示,3 个不同工具都能把模型对有害请求的拒绝率几乎清零,最好的一种甚至做到 100% 服从。这不只是“越狱工具”又多了一个,而是再次提醒我们:开源模型的安全训练并没有外界想得那么稳固。
6月3日·www.reddit.com
AgentCLI
把 10 个 Agent 工具做成一套命令行,中国团队开始补齐落地里的脏活累活
一位开发者把 10 个 Agent Skill(可复用的任务模块)沉淀成零依赖 CLI 工具,解决目录、校验、同步和公共脚本复用问题。它不新奇,但值得关心,因为中国团队做 Agent,真正卡住的往往不是模型,而是这些没人愿意反复重做的工程细节。
6月3日·juejin.cn